Achieving Democracy
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Plurality Vote How should society collectively make choices in a fair and democratic way? In the decision making system used most often in the United States, citizens periodically express their sentiment by voting for a candidate or measure. Whichever alternative receives the most votes (a plurality) is chosen. It is a simple decision system — easy to understand and seemingly fair. Unfortunately, it is often not fair at all. For example, an election in a liberal community might have three candidates, two of whom are liberal, the third a conservative. If the liberal voters in the community split their votes between the two liberal candidates, then the conservative may win — with perhaps votes totalling 35% and 25% for the two liberal candidates and 40% for the conservative. So even though 60% of the people prefer a liberal to represent them, the conservative candidate wins the election. The decision system determines a winner, but it does not do it in a way that seems fair or democratic.
منابع مشابه
The Role of Multicultural Education in Constructing a Democratic-pluralistic Society in Iran
Multicultural education, as an educational reform movement, has been given ample attention since 1960s. It has sought to promote the democratic values and educational equality in culturally and racially diverse communities. One of the most important issues at the forefront of education in multi-ethnic societies is how to bring social cohesion by helping people from different cultural, racial, l...
متن کاملToward a Fully Realized Human Being: Dewey’s Active-Individual-always-in-the-Making
This essay explores the conception of the individual in Dewey’s democratic writings. Following Dewey’s lead, I argue that it is human individuality, including our impulses, habits, and capacities, along with an appropriate environment, that represents the uniqueness and power of every individual. In achieving our individuality, we form habits to live and to grow; we strive toward a fully realiz...
متن کاملDEMOCRACY AND DICHOTOMIES: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts
Prominent scholars engaged in comparative research on democratic regimes are in sharp disagreement over the choice between a dichotomous or graded approach to the distinction between democracy and nondemocracy. This choice is substantively important because it affects the findings of empirical research. It is methodologically important because it raises basic issues, faced by both qualitative a...
متن کاملThe Effects of Democracy on Environment Quality Index in Selected OIC Countries
The relationship between democracy and environment has always been controversial. Some scientists found that democracy had a positive impact on reducing environmental disruption. Other scholars claimed that democracy tends to accelerate environmental degradation. Ther are many studies focusing on main determinants of environmental degradation. More recently, democracy is considered to be one of...
متن کاملAnalysis and Criticism of Epistemological Approach to Democracy and Impossibility of Religious Democracy
In this article the author clarifies his epistemological approach to democracy based on its two crucial principles namely autonomy and dialogue. He has demonstrated that distinguished scholars of this approach deny the integration of religion and democracy and believe in the impossibility of religious democracy. Given this theory, the author has criticized humanological and epistemological foun...
متن کاملPolitical Stability, Corruption, Democracy and Terrorism In the Middle East and North Africa
Terrorism has been considered as a challenge with serious effect in the world as a result of instability, corruption and lack of democracy in most countries. Confronting this phenomenon requires recognizing its roots to find possible solutions. This study aims to examine the effect of some actual factors which causes the terrorism in short and long run. To this end, investigation has been condu...
متن کامل